Offline
Can’t be doing that Karnell, do hope the club offer him some help though.
Offline
Don’t like the clubs statement at all.
Why comment on that he bet against Chippenham? Just to kick him in front of the fans?
The lad had been putting hundreds of bets on for years across the divisions, that’s why the FA nailed him. He very stupidly did one against the club as well.
Clubs right to do it, just don’t like the highlighting of particular details.
Offline
I think we would all agree on that, but not surprised with boards statement. Poor but to be expected I think.
Offline
TindlesFirstTouch wrote:
Don’t like the clubs statement at all.
Why comment on that he bet against Chippenham? Just to kick him in front of the fans?
The lad had been putting hundreds of bets on for years across the divisions, that’s why the FA nailed him. He very stupidly did one against the club as well.
Clubs right to do it, just don’t like the highlighting of particular details.
It's more serious betting on your own team's matches, especially to lose. That's unforgiveable.
Don't we as fans deserve to know the full details?
Offline
Space Raider wrote:
TindlesFirstTouch wrote:
Don’t like the clubs statement at all.
Why comment on that he bet against Chippenham? Just to kick him in front of the fans?
The lad had been putting hundreds of bets on for years across the divisions, that’s why the FA nailed him. He very stupidly did one against the club as well.
Clubs right to do it, just don’t like the highlighting of particular details.It's more serious betting on your own team's matches, especially to lose. That's unforgiveable.
Don't we as fans deserve to know the full details?
What was the Jarvis issue ?
Offline
James wrote:
TindlesFirstTouch wrote:
Don’t like the clubs statement at all.
Why comment on that he bet against Chippenham? Just to kick him in front of the fans?
The lad had been putting hundreds of bets on for years across the divisions, that’s why the FA nailed him. He very stupidly did one against the club as well.
Clubs right to do it, just don’t like the highlighting of particular details.Jesus first of all you want a statement and now you’ve got one you don’t like it. If the board didn’t tell you the truth that would be wrong too.
If you don’t like what’s going on take your support somewhere else.
I did want a statement ✅
I don’t like it ✅
The board can tell the truth ✅
The board don’t need to go into nitty gritty detail of the truth ❌
They are quick to kill players/managers in statements about details such as discipline etc but all very quiet on George/Evans/Guthrie/Jarvis which puts them in a bad light!
Offline
Guthrie left.
George left.
Evans job has changed so can’t train on Tuesdays, can’t train so won’t get in squad. Still signed on for us.
Jarvis, no idea
Last edited by Wellard (21/2/2020 11:02 PM)
Offline
TindlesFirstTouch wrote:
They are quick to kill players/managers in statements about details such as discipline etc but all very quiet on George/Evans/Guthrie/Jarvis which puts them in a bad light!
The difference being those are seen as internal matters whereas the full details of Karnell's gambling breaches were going to be revealed by the FA anyway.
Offline
There's no risk of a point's deduction is there?
Offline
Space Raider wrote:
TindlesFirstTouch wrote:
They are quick to kill players/managers in statements about details such as discipline etc but all very quiet on George/Evans/Guthrie/Jarvis which puts them in a bad light!
The difference being those are seen as internal matters whereas the full details of Karnell's gambling breaches were going to be revealed by the FA anyway.
Then let the FA do that