Park shouldn't play on it. It won't fix all the problems but it's a start.

TheVoice wrote:

Hmm it's a tricky one but Park have got relevance and if they don't play here.. where??

Stanley Park?

Yorkie wrote:

Chris43 wrote:

TheVoice wrote:

Hmm it's a tricky one but Park have got relevance and if they don't play here.. where??

Stanley Park?

Don’t think that Stanley Park would fulfil Western League regulations.
 

True.

Investment in the pitch then if it's being used every week. Lots of pitches have struggled this year tbf.
 

Not with a slope like ours unfortunately. You would need to build up the bottom end of the pitch by the Snack Hut by approx.9 feet for approx. one third of the pitch to make it anywhere near level with the top end. You simply cannot lay 3g pitches on a slope

AJG - I have visited Cirencester Town on a number of occasions this season when we were away and too far to travel, and I can assure you their pitch is now perfectly flat. Getting the pitch level was part of the deal in laying their new 3G pitch, and the contractors had to raise the level by 2 feet at their Dome end to achieve a level surface, and what a brilliant jog they have done to. Ciren's is probably the best 3G pitch I've seen. Apparently the whole scheme cost in excess of £1.5 million, partly funded by local businesses and the Council. Perhaps NWDC would like to get involved. Oh hang on, they only support rugby don't they ?