Offline
Our position in league table shows us 5th from bottom with 9 points from 9 games combined with some dire performances have given us a disappointing start to the season
Is it time for a change of management?
Offline
The only word l can think of after what l saw today is awful. For the first 20 minutes or so marginally the better team but with this total obsession of 1 pass sideways 4 passes back meant didn't take advantage of this period. Second half Salisbury came more at us and were on top. Our 2 goals came from the only brief periods(apart from the last 5 minutes or so) when we moved the ball forward quickly. I say brief because as soon as we scored immediately back to back and sideways passing.
Substitutions required but when made baffling. Williams,King,Bradbury and McClure taken off with Johnson,Bray, Parsons and Grant brought on which left the defence in disarray. Highlighted by fact number of times Salisbury had unmarked players in the penalty area. If it wasn't for Will Henry hate to think what the score would have been. And on top of all this Salisbury weren't exactly a good side but can't complain about the score. Finally with the management team against playing 2 strikers( today 2 strikers on the pitch together for about 10 minutes)
I wonder how much longer it will be before Harry Parsons wants away.
Offline
Also not sure if Parsons will put up with it for long. Be surprised if being back up to a 33 year old was part of his signing negotiations.As the management persist with one striker through the middle,surely Parsons who is a natural striker should be the preference? Seems we are wasting him. Quite obvious if McClure (who it seems can only play for 70 to 75 minutes) is to play he needs someone up front alongside him - the team even looks better with two up top. Nine games in and already fair few questionable selections/decisions.Will say it again - Chippenham never look a well coached team especially going forward with the same old sideways and backwards stuff the main game plan!!
Last edited by Argus (22/9/2024 8:09 AM)
Offline
We are only in September and already supporters are getting sick to death of the totally negative style of play promoted by our management team. (Sideways and backwards out from the back)
In Harry Parsons we have the ideal centre forward but what do we do today after he scored a hat trick last Saturday put him on the bench and continue with MM who clearly has had his day! Both are contract players so a good wage is guaranteed. Also we continue to start with ex Academy players when we have, in my opinion, better players relegated to the bench.
Next Saturdays FA Cup fixture against WSM provides the ideal opportunity to play a much more positive style because winning is a must!!
We don’t need a change in management just a change in playing style!!
Last edited by chippy (21/9/2024 7:43 PM)
Offline
Sorry.... but I disagree with most of the above. I left the RayMac yesterday a lot more frustrated than angry. I thought we were the better team throughout and played through Salisbury on innumerable occasions with our sharp zippy brand of passing. Went behind ( to a good goal) which was Salisbury's only clear chance of the whole first half. We had already had a really well worked goal disallowed after Willl Dawes ( I think) picked up the rebound from their keeper's save. Not sure how that was off-side? We looked composed. They didn't press , so we had none of the dangerous and frustrating rolling around of the ball across our penalty area. Each time we levelled ( and Tom Mehew's goal was goal of the game) we looked as though we'd go on and win it. The exposure at the back which led to their 2nd and 3rd was largely down to the fact that GH clearly wanted/expected to go on and win the game, so set up a much more attacking formation... Johnson, Parsons, McClure and Dawes with TOE just behind them. (I do agree however that removing both Williams and King unsettled the back line too much).This exposed us and we paid for it. I've rarely seen criticism on this Forum of GH being too ambitious. I saw it as a welcome confidence in our superiority from a normally defensive-minded Manager. Frustratingly ... it didn't work out.
I don't see working the ball from one side of the pitch safely as you go forward up to the half-way line.. as messing about. It is normal fare.. probing and looking for space.. and totally different to the sort of kamikaze invitation to the press we sometimes indulge in in our own 6 yard box. There was little/none of that
I thought most had a good game. I wouldn't get too protective of, or overstate the capabilities of Harry Parsons. Despite a confidence-boosting hat-trick at Nailsea, he also missed some absolute sitters there. He is obviously a very intense young man, who prowls around like a panther with a wasp in pursuit of it. As has been said before, he really does seem to get into the right places. He's a great asset but now has to fulfil the other half of his job, which is to put the ball into the back of the net.
As a very (!) long response to Frank's question:- Accepting that Torquay was a disaster... we played our best football of the season the following Saturday against high-flying Tonbridge, buried Nailsea the following week and got edged out by Salisbury yesterday. So No.. not time for a change of Manager. When I think back a year to some of the really poor performances of Sept/October last year, we are so much further ahead now as a team, and to these old eyes, playing so much better. Our bench is strong and we have a bunch of quality players. If we're in a dangerous position come February /March then things might be different.. but I want to believe they won't be and we'll be looking up the table rather than at the trap-door.
Last edited by Rambler (22/9/2024 10:00 AM)
Offline
Just listened to the managers post match interview. Says first half we did not get our offensive game going and were not making runs in behind or beyond. Exactly how many of us saw it. Why then, does the team get encouraged to slowly recirculate the ball not bringing about the opportunity to get in behind the opposing defence? Would like a question to be asked in these interviews one day - why does it takes 6 or 7 passes to move forward 25 yards and still have the opposition comfortably in position in front of us? Tough game next week against WSM but like Chippy says it is a ideal opportunity to play positively and get people interested in the club again.
Last edited by Argus (22/9/2024 2:40 PM)
Offline
Worth listening to Brian Dutton's post-match interview, too. Salisbury FC Facebook
Offline
Any news on AAH.Hasn’t been in the squad since Scoring against Enfield,assume he is injured.He does bring a different attacking option.
Offline
oldman wrote:
Any news on AAH.Hasn’t been in the squad since Scoring against Enfield,assume he is injured.He does bring a different attacking option.
Went off injured against Tonbridge two weeks ago - guessing but it didn't look good. Keep checking the Friday previews on the website but no news on his situation has so far been mentioned.
Last edited by Argus (22/9/2024 11:32 PM)
Offline
I think GH said groin strain and 4-6 weeks out, during post-match interview. Unfortunately, I would guess the longer period of time.... at least. Tom Mehew's kept him out several months I believe.